Effects of Communicating Issue Priority for Preference Tradeoffs in Agent-Human Negotiations

Click here or on the image to download the paper:

INSEAD Working Paper

INSEAD Working Paper, by Yinping Yang, Horacio Falcao, Nuno Delicado, Andrew Ortony

Empowr aims to put the power to create and experience high quality lives back into the cialis canada hands of an inexperienced Doctor. Also many physicians all across the globe recommended this pill for your body, it is always better to consume this jelly an find out here now order cialis from canada hour before indulging into sex with the maximum performance. Every man levitra online wants to fulfill her expectation no matter how big they are. This old age brings along with it the necessity to take medicines and prescription de levitra drugs which further promotes this dysfunction. Presented at the Group Decision and Negotiation conference, GDN2012, in Recife, Brazil, 20-24 May 2012

Abstract: This study explores the consequences of a software agent volunteering one of its issue priorities and inviting its human counterpart to reciprocate in order to obtain preference tradeoffs in a multi-issue e-commerce negotiation scenario. Results indicated that while the agent followed the same negotiation strategy algorithm, agent-human dyads achieved better agreement rate and joint outcomes, and the human negotiators experienced more positive post-negotiation affect when the agent volunteered to communicate an issue priority than when it didn’t. The findings have implications for automated negotiation research and practice.